Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Peer Review 1

McPhee, Nic. "I tend to scribble a lot". 01/26/2008 via Flickr.
CC0 Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

I peer reviewed Emily Sutton's QRG draft. Her draft can be found here and my edits and scores can be found here.


After looking at Emily's QRG (which I chose strategically because I did a QRG) I realized how much I still have to do. I knew that I still needed pictures but I now realize that I have some formatting things to fix as well. Emily did a really good job of integrating the format in a way that is visually pleasing and I need to work on that same thing. Emily, however, used a lot of pictures, more than the "right amount" in my opinion and they begin to distract from the overall QRG. My challenge now will be adding more info about stakeholders to make it all more clear and adding relevant photos while still keeping the formatting correct.

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Draft of Project One

Vaughan, James. "please-stand-by". 02/02/2010 via Flickr.
CC0 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

Currently trying to figure out how to put my QRG on here! I tried copy and pasting but the pictures don't transfer correctly and some of them not at all... I'm working on fixing it and I will post it ASAP! Might just end up reformatting.

Free YouTube Stuff. "A Few Moments Later". 12/03/2015 via YouTube.
Creative Commons Attribution License

Alright, I've reformatted it, mostly by copying and pasting things in small chunks.

To the peer who is reviewing my work:

My QRG is centered around the Jennifer Lawrence pay disparity controversy. It has recently become public knowledge that female actresses in Hollywood are making considerably less money than their male co-stars. Because of this Lawrence wrote a letter expressing her anger and disgust about the issue. The backlash was anything but neutral. Many co-stars, both men and women, support Lawrence but some believe that the discrepancy is not gender related and is instead a plea for more money. 

My project is a work in progress. I still need to work on the formatting, add citations (whatever form those may be in), and add pictures. However I do believe my content is all there. Please give me any ideas or fixes you see fit! Thank you :)

PS: I use the words "women" and "woman" A LOT in here... Please look out and make sure I used the right ones!

My QRG:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oGM6ndGrs135AhUVkCKKEmq4fbsnUv0K2kEWK63OxaY/edit?usp=sharing 

PS: In my actual word document the quotes are graphics and look much better than they do on this google Doc

The Time Period

Herrera, Chuck. "Clock". 09/09/2014 via Pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain.
My controversy is fairly current, October 12th, 2015, just under half a year ago. In this post I will be looking for other events that happened in Los Angeles on October 12th.

Local:

http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-cal-state-watts-20151012-story.html

http://www.latimes.com/sports/usc/la-sp-usc-sarkisian-20151012-story.html

National:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-obama-60-minutes-syria-isis-2016-presidential-race/

http://www.occupydemocrats.com/2015/10/12/family-of-oregon-massacre-victim-obamas-visit-brought-us-peace-was-not-political-2/

Global:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/isis-is-leading-suspect-in-deadly-terrorist-attack-in-turkey-tensions-and-fear-of-violence-remains/

http://www.mintpressnews.com/israeli-airstrike-kills-pregnant-woman-2-year-old-in-gaza/210274/

On October 12th, 2015 there was a lot of murder and mayhem, as my dad would say, going on in the world. Obama met with 60 minutes and tried to defend himself on the issue of Syria. Meanwhile, in Turkey ISIS was believed to be tied to a deadly terrorist attack in Turkey. There was also an Israeli Airstrike that killed a pregnant woman and her 2 year old son. In California however, the most dramatic news I found was about reforming the education system and USC's football coach being deemed too ill to coach his team. I am not here to say that the issue with USC's coaches health isn't important but in the grand scheme of things, LA was in fairly good shape on October 12th.


The Setting

OpenClipartVectors. "California". 10/08/2013 via Pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain.
Every good story has to have a setting and a controversy is no different. In this blog post I will be outlining the setting for my controversy.

My Controversy is based more on an event than on a place and unfortunately my event isn't a riot or a speech but instead is a letter. Or rather the writing of a letter. And that of course makes writing a post based on setting a little bit more difficult. With That being said my story still has a setting its just a bit more abstract. Jennifer Lawrence wrote the letter that ignited the controversy after the Sony server was hacked leaking private emails and information that detailed the pay gaps bewteen men and women actors, namely Jennifer Lawrence, Bradley Cooper, and Jeremy Renner who all stared together in "American Hustle". Lawrence did not speak out about the issue until almost a year later when Jenni, a co-owner of the online newsletter Lenny.com, asked Jennifer Lawrence to write a newsletter on her feelings about the wage issue. Lawrence, who is known for her mild manner and overall pleasant personality did not hold back in the letter. She was obviously angry about the issue and as many people do when safe behind a screen she let it all out. Sony head quarters is in California. As is Lawrence's home where she sat at her computer and wrote the letter so I suppose you could say the setting is California but that seems a bit broad to me. I believe that the true setting of this controversy is the internet. Without the internet the information never would have been sent
via email. Without internet Korea never would have intercepted the server, because there would be no server. And without internet there would be no newsletter. Just as without Troy there'd be no Trojan hourse, without the internet there would be no wage gap controversy. However, because this is a Hollywood controversy I will be using LA as the setting for my next blog post.

Stakeholder #3

Rinaldi, Eva. "Jeremy Renner". 08/07/2012 via Flickr.
CC0 Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.
Jeremy Renner is my third stakeholder. Renner has not opposed woman actresses earning more money, per say, but he definitely hasn't backed it up either. He is the only stakeholder who has not taken pity on women, or Lawrence as a whole.


1. Who is the stakeholder?

Jeremy Renner is the oldest of  seven siblings. His parents married young and co-owned a bowling alley in their hometown, Modesto, California. Renner's parents filed for divorce when he was 10 years old. Renner is a well educated man holding 2 degrees in various, and rather random fields, including criminology and world religion. Renner is also educated in martial arts and general contracting. When Renner is not acting he runs a small contracting/house renovating company with his best friend. Renner is about 5'10" with a muscular build. He is 41 years of age with purposefully messy hair, signature 5 o' clock shadow, and brown eyes. The handsome actor was married for a short time to a lovely model, the two have a son together and have shared custody since their divorce after one year of marriage. Renner often plays action characters or superhero's. Some of his most popular films are marvel. Jeremy's acting career began to really take off in 2008, prior to that he had had small TV roles and minute movie script roles but in 2008 his most popular movie, "The Hurt Locker" came out and was a huge successs. Renner was nominated for a series of awards for that film and his progression has not stopped yet as he continues to produce more popular films.

2. 3 Specific Claims

1. Men do not make more because of Gender.
   - "Adding he fully supports actresses receiving equal pay as actors, he said he’s more focused on his craft than what everyone is making."

2. If women want more money they have to get it themselves.
   - "Renner went on to say that he does not deal with money matters in general"

3. It is not the male costars job to negotiate for the actress.
   -"not an actor’s duty to participate in salary negotiations."

3. How Credible are these Claims?

1. Claim one comes from a reputable but potentially baised page. The article uses phrases like "clearer mind" when comparing Renner to Cooper a sign of potential bias.

2.This claim seems valid. Renner has stated that he has no issue with women being paid fairly he just does not care to get involved. Because the issue of pay for his colleagues in not inherently his issue I understand his point.

3. This is also a valid claim. No one wants to take less money, obviously. Cooper proposes that all major stars in a movie discuss salary with the company but Renner disagrees. The money is his to keep unless they take it from him and Renner does not necessarily have an obligation to give the money to his costars, that is the production companies call.

4. How do these claims compare to the other stakeholders?

These claims are the complete opposite from the others. The other two stakeholders are working towards fixing the issue while Renner is truly letting others take care of it. He believes that the equality of pay is not his responsibility but is the actresses and the production company's (Sony). The two approaches could not be more different.

Stakeholder #2

Kali. "Wester Star". 07/08/2011 via Deviant Art.
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0

Stake Holder number two is Bradley Cooper. Cooper is on the same side of the controversy as Jennifer Lawrence but he has a different point of view.

1. Who is the stakeholder?

Bradley Cooper is a 41 year old actor born and raised in Philadelphia. This handsome actor with his blue eyes and deep voice often plays action characters in his movies, and if not action characters they are still always strong. In the movie, "Silver Linings Playbook" Cooper plays a mentally distraught man who cannot control his emotions, especially anger but strives to overcome his mental illness with the help of his also mentally ill friend played by Jennifer Lawrence. Cooper has been acting for years and has accumulated over 20 awards and received just short of 70 nominations. The actor was named People Magazine's Sexiest man alive in 2011, he's a fit and muscular 6 feet 1 inch in height, with piercing ice blue eyes and brown wavy hair. Despite the actor reaching "middle age"he still play the characters of much younger men. Despite Cooper's dashing looks he's not just a pretty face. Cooper also has a Bachelors degree from Georgetown University and an MFA in acting from The New School. Cooper's Hollywood acting career began in 2002 and he has been acting ever since

2. 3 Specific Claims

1. Actors should stand up and defend their female co-stars.

2. Men should be willing to take a pay cut in order for women to make the same money as them.

3. Actors should potentially negotiate equal pay for women.

3. How Credible are these Claims?

1. This claim comes from an article that I believe could be biased because of the location and age of the author. With that being said however, this claim is mostly centered around Cooper's opinions and therefore cannot necessarily be wrong.
 
2. This claim comes from the same potentially biased article as the first one but is backed up by a second article making the claim appear more justified.

3. This claim is the most outrageous of them all if you ask me but it is, once again, mentioned in multiple articles. Cooper seems to be interested in teaching his female co-stars ho to negotiate.
 
4. How do these claims compare to the other stakeholders?


 Lawrence never says anything about needing men to back her up so these, while they do not appose those of Jennifer Lawrence, do not necessarily agree either. These completely contradict those of co-star Jeremy Renner who believes that woman should really figure it out for themselves.

Stakeholder #1

Laakkonen, Tiina. "Dior ads with Jennifer Lawrence". 12/18/2013 via Flickr.
CC0 Atribution 2.0 Generic.
Jennifer Lawrence is my main stakeholder. As one of the most popular actresses of our time Lawrence pulls a lot of weight in popular culture. As a usually mild mannered girl her anger related to this subject shows how much she truly cares.

1. Who is the stakeholder?

Everybody knows a little something about Jennifer Lawrence. Be it her role as Katniss Everdeen in “The Hunger Games” or her part in “Silver Linings Playbook” Lawrence is thought to be one of the most talented and famous actresses of our generation. Jennifer Lawrence was born in Louisville, Kentucky but she never fit in. As Lawrence grew up children picked on the lovely blue eyed, brown haired girl who never did well in school. Lawrence was “special” as she calls herself, she had A.D.D. as well as A.D.H.D. and was never able to focus in a classroom, when she turned 14 she convinced her mom to take her to New York for a shot at becoming a movie star. On the first day in New York a man, a modeling agent saw Lawrence and quickly scooped her up as he saw her raw talent. She soon climbed the ladder and moved from photos, to commercials, to motion pictures. Lawrence thrived in the acting world, her compulsive and emotional nature was now not considered a hindrance or oddity but instead was instrumental to her career. Lawrence’s goofy personality, beautiful long brown hair, bright blue eyes and Kentucky charm did her well and she soon obtained the role as Katniss Everdeen in “The Hunger Games” series. In this movies Lawrence showed a range and talent that many actresses do not possess. Lawrence can sing, act, think, and maintain character in a way that is intoxicating for the viewer. Lawrence is now, 10 years after her move from Kentucky, an Oscar winning actress who still has her wits and charm about her.

2. 3 Specific Claims

1. She was paid less than her male counterparts.
    - "...the lower profit participation paid to Lawrence, which was disclosed in the leak of stolen emails from Sony Pictures Entertainment last year, exposed how women are routinely paid less than men in Hollywood."
2. She does not ask for more money at the cost of seeming greedy, unladylike or rude.
    - "I  would be lying if I didn't say there was an element of wanting to be liked that influenced my decision to close the deal without a real fight. I didn't want to seem "difficult" or "spoiled'."
3. Actresses deserve and can earn just as much as male actors.
    - "Pratt will earn $12m for the film, while Lawrence will net $20m upfront or 30% of the film’s profits."

3. How Credible are these Claims?

1. Claim one is completely verified as it comes from the production company’s server directly. In this case Lawrence is not using emotions or logic but instead is basing her claim on information from a different, credible source: Sony.
2. This claim is inherently fueled by emotion. Lawrence makes this claim as she feels that this is the true reason for her low pay. She believes she is being taken advantage of because she is a woman. This claim is most likely biased because the quote is from Lawrence but is also valid because she knows herself best.
3. This claim feels obvious to me. I think that any levelheaded American would agree that both women and men should have the ability to earn the same amount as men. This claim is stated and backed up in all of the pro-equal wage articles.

4. How do these claims compare to the other stakeholders?

These claims agree with Bradley Cooper, a male co-star who has been advocating equal pay for his female co-stars. Sony has not spoken out on the issue but actions speak louder than words and the company has recently been offering Lawrence larger sums for her talent. Finally, Jeremy Renner. These claims do not match up with Renner. Renner believes that women who have been asking or complaining for more are greedy. Additionally Renner believes that women who are main characters but have less screen time that the male characters have no right to make as much as the men.