Sunday, February 7, 2016

The Big Event

Giakkas, Christos. "Red Theater Curtain". 08/29/2014 via pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain.
For it to be a controversy there has to be a jumping off point, the point where something went wrong and some one or some group got angry. In this post I will be outlining the big even of my controversy.


Monday, November 24th 2014 Sony headquarters in Culver City, California experienced something strange; an image of a skull with long red bony fingers flashed on every computer simultaneously along with a message warning them to cooperate. The Sony platform had been hacked, presumably by North Korea as an attempt to keep Sony from releasing their newest movie, “The Interview”. As a result of this hack that lasted nearly a month much of Sony’s secret information: pay logs, employment records, manuscripts, emails, etcetera, was no longer hidden from the private eye.  On December 12th 2014 emails regarding the pay for actors starring in the Sony picture “American Hustle” surfaced. Many reporters wrote adaptations on the issue but the actors stayed quiet as they examined the issue themselves. 

Flash forward to October 12th, 2015. After actresses of all caliber have been speaking out against wage gaps between men and women, like Patricia Arquette at the 2015 Oscars, Jennifer Lawrence publishes a newsletter using Lenny.com. In her letter she explains that she feels taken advantage of and mistreated by the wage issues that she has faced. She describes what was outlined in the leaked emails, Lawrence the co-star of Bradley Cooper in American Hustle made 7% commission while Cooper pocketed 9%. Lawrence’s letter has reignited the debate; do women actresses deserve to make as much as men?

My Sources

ClkerFreeVectorImages. "Chain Links". 06/29/2014 via Pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain.
Well to start I hope you find my image to be clever! This blog post will consist solely of hyperlinks (get it? LINKS like in the picture!!) to my sources with short accompaniments proving that these sources are valid and reputable.


Where? Variety.com (New York, weekly). Variety was established in 1905, over a hundred years ago, and is considered a reputable entertainment magazine based on media and pop-culture. Acording to Wikipedia Variety is "written for entertainment executives".

Who? When you google the author of the article, Ramin Setoodeh, you will find A LOT of different articles that all say the same thing. Setoodeh is apparently an extreme homophobe. Setoodeh is quoted as responding to a Newsweek article saying that gay actors cannot convincingly play the role of a straight actor. So right off the bat his credibility as an unbiased commentator on actors is compromised. However, Setoodeh is a well known author and commentator on actors and Hollywood.

When? The article was posted November 10th, 2015. Posted just under a month after Jennifer Lawrence published her infamous letter to Lenny outline why she was angry and what was so unfair about the pay gap. The article was posted 1 day prior to Lawrence meeting with and talking to Diane Sawyer. 

What? This article is a general overview. It introduces all of the female stakeholders I will be utilizing and a few more that I find to be less significant in this controversy. The article is rather broad and will be used more as a reference than to define specif events.


Where? Forbes is a reputable business journal. The journal is widely known for being a credible source on business topics, considered the gold standard of business news.
Who? Madeline Berg works for the Forbes business team and writes Entertainment section articles in her spare time. Berg graduated from Brown University with degrees in history and art history. Berg is a respected journalist and business woman. 

When? November 12th, 2015. Similarly to the Variety article above this article was posted nearly a month after Jennifer Lawrence's letter to Lenny came out. The article encompasses more than just Hollywood actresses, however. The article talks about racial pay disparities, as well as wage gaps between movie, small film, and television actresses. The article was posted the day after Lawrence's meeting with Dianne Sawyer.
What? This article focuses less on the actresses and more on the money and other, larger issues. The article, though it begins with Lawrence, encompasses movie stars, small film stars, TV stars, and african-american actresses and the pay disparages that they all deal with. 


Where? The Hollywood reporter is just what it sounds like. The online newspaper is just about entertainment news. Be it reviews, critiques, big stars news, or award show coverage the Hollywood reporter has it. The journal is known to be a bit right winged as it is geared to a weathlier more sophisticated crowd.

Who? Jordan Riefe is a culture writer for the Hollywood reporter and a freelance fim and fine arts contributer for the Guardian. The writer worked in the film business as a camera man for directors like Tom Hanks. Riefe is single and holds a masters degree.

When? November 4th, 2015. Once again, almost a month after Lawrence poster her letter and a week prior to her interview with Sawyer. This article was posted a day after Lawrence was quoted saying that her wage garnishments were not Sony's fault.

What? This article combines both Lawrence and the production company, Sony. The article is centered around Lawrence's quote absolving the pay disparity blame from Sony and placing it all on herself. (A bit of a contradiction). 


Where? The Guardian is meant to be a full service newspaper. With sections from business to arts to sports the Guardian reports national news. 

Who? Nigel M. Smith is a writer and reporter for the Guardian who currently lives in LA. Movies, as we all know, are filmed in Hollywood aka Los Angeles so Smith is near the entertainment scene all the time, giving his credibility. Smith has always been apart of entertainment news as he has, in the past, been an editor for Indiewire, a small private E-news journal, and now works for the Guardian and MTV simultaneously.
When? October 15th, 2015. The first article thus far to genuinely be reacting to Lawrence's letter as opposed to informing the reader before the Sawyer interview. Truly an explanatory piece for those who had not read the letter themselves.   
What? An explanatory and informative piece about why Lawrence is speaking out about the wage issues. The article was posted a day after Lawrence came out with her letter. The article explains an overview of the issue and what Lawrence had to say about it.


Where? Lenny letter is an online newsletter. The letters are not  all written by "Lenny" (Jenni Konner and Lena Dunham) but are posted by them. The site is not a blog but has very similar charactersitics. The Blog is also very obviously feminist and geared towards women.

Who? Jennifer Lawrence herself composed this letter. It was then posted on the website by "Lenny". This is an entirely one-sided letter as it is a first hand interpretation from my number one Stakeholder. 

When? October 12th, 2015. Just over a month before Lawrence's Hunger Games came out and just a few short days after the pay information was leaked after Sony's server was hacked nearly a year prior.
  
What? A letter written as a form of speaking out against the injustice. Lawrence states that she's done acting "adorable" and wants to start fighting for what she deserves. 


Where? Hotair is a website that thrives on controversial news posted by anyone. The "articles" are newsletters written by subscribers Just by visiting the site you get the feeling that its almost a rant page. When you link to this article you will find a short article that just gives the most basic controversial facts and quotes followed by pages and pages of angry or sarcastic comments. The website is obviously filled with controversy but in this case that's good.

Who? Honesty, no idea who wrote this article. The name is "C.T. Rex", obviously a pseudonym. Overall this source is probably not very credible, I will be using it for basic info and ideas but not as a main reference.

When? October 23rd, 2015, after Lawrence's letter has taken off Jeremy Renner responds on the 22nd, this Newsletter is in response to Renner.

What? Jeremy Renner is not having any part in the damsel in distress thing. He instead calls women actresses greedy for asking for more money and states that it is not his job to negotiate for women co-stars. 

Where? Philly.com is an online blog server for the local Philadelphia public. Philly.com is a bloging website connected to the Philadelphia daily newspaper, the Philadelphia Inquirer. The blog posts are organized like articles and put into categories, this particular post is in the entertainment category. Philly might seem like a random place for this controversy to be considered "local news" but the stakeholder, Bradley Cooper, is actually from Philly. Because of this the post is likely to back the side that Cooper has decided to take.

Who? Nick Valada is a writer for the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philly.com, and Philadelphia Daily News. He writes on entertainment in all 3 papers. He has held jobs as both a writer and a reporter as well as web design. Valada says in his LinkedIn profile that he is obsessed with entertainment and culture and believes that the internet has the ability to make coverage more interesting and explorable. Experienced writer, may be biased my life in Philly and actors Philly background.

When? October 20th, 2015 the day following Bradley Cooper, Lawrence's co-star, making a statement about what he believes he could do to bridge the gap. Source uses many other sources, very second hand article.

What? Bradley Cooper makes a statement about what he can do to help mind the gap. Cooper co-stars with Lawrence and feels guilty, about being made more money for comparable on screen time. Cooper speaks out about what he thinks Actors, and actresses, as co-stars should do to combat the issue.


Where? Sunday morning NPR, National Public Radio. NPR is nationally known for being educational radio, its not all songs and commercials but instead is mostly interviews and news. The station is often called liberal by conservatives but there is not true proof, the station is actually though of as quite unbiased and truthful. 

Who? Arun Rath is a 45 year old prominent reporter and broadcast journalist for NPR. Because he has worked for NPR for years and is prominent and well known I believe he is a safe bet for unbiased and valid information.

When? Sunday July 19th 2015. NPR on Sunday mornings is usually bigger more entertaining stories that have built up during the week. This week news about pay issues had risen to the surface because of the Sony hacks and NPR reported on it. Actresses and actors quotes were not used except for a few rising star actresses who had reported making 10 cents on ever dollar a male actor made.

What? News report on just the issue at hand. Simply explaining the sexism issue in Hollywood, both the pay gap and the ratio of men to women. The show does name drop a bit but there are no quotes form any of our stakeholders.


Where? The LA Times is a great resource because it is local. Sony, the film studio, the acting, the pay checks. it all comes from Los Angeles. The LA Times is a local journal much like any local journal, there are many sections and this article comes from the entertainment portion. In class we discussed that the most reputable source is the contact source and this is it. The LA Times  is $1 per issue, sundays are $2 so the paper is affordable and most likely geared towards the general public.

Who? This article was a collaboration between Daniel Miller, Meg James and Amy Kaufman. All three writers are contact reporters who report and record first hand information. Amy moved to LA to be an actresses but realized that a more realistic dream would be reporting on actresses (motivated to write by her passion for acting). Meg is a corporate media reporter who reports on media related business ( motivated by the exchange of money in this case). Finally, Daniel  is new to the LA Times, he had previously been a writer for the Hollywood Reporter as film business reporter and also for the LA Business Journal (motivated mainly by business by slightly by the Hollywood scene).

When? October 8th, 2015 after the passing of the "equal-pay act" in California. This seems obvious, the reported on something that had just passed after the Governor passed the bill. There does not seem to be any bias, mostly quotes and fact telling

What? This is related to the production company, Sony. The passing of this law is believed to be directed towards Hollywood as wage issues had been in the news. The bill requires employers to compensate men and women in the same job entirely equally.


Where? Well I watched the video on YouTube but it was posted by ABC. ABC is a national news company that reports on anything from murder and mayhem to who wore what on the Red carpet. The company is considered to be reputable and respected nationally and does not, inherently, seem partial to either side of the story.

Who? Diane Sawyer is a very well known journalist. She has worked for ABC for years and has been in the spot light as a head journalist for as long as I can remember. In this case of women's plea for equal pay Sawyers gender could play role in biasing her a bit but upon listening to the interview she seems to simply ask questions, not biased or beveled questions either.

When? November 12th, 2015 is when the interview was aired. I assume that it was filmed about a week prior but ABC does not state the exact day. This interview aired just short of a month after Lawrence published her letter on unfair pay.

What? A broadcast interview. This source deals solely with Lawrence. Though there is mention of other costars Jennifer Lawrence is without a doubt the stakeholder in this source.


Saturday, February 6, 2016

Analysis of My Rhetorical Situation

Schweihofer, Stefan. "Triangle". 10/01/2014 via Pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain.
Analyzing the rhetorical situation of a literary work allows the reader or viewer to better understand the contextual value of the work. Outlining the rhetorical situation before creating a literary work gives a baseline for the work that may act as a loose frame to keep the author on track. In this post I will be outlining the rhetorical situation for my controversy: The wage Gap between men and women in Hollywood.

1. Audience

The controversy I chose is centered around popular culture and therefore would probably be best suited for younger people say 18-45 years of age. The issue deals with popular U.S. movie stars in Hollywood limited the pool of interest to people, most likely Americans, who watch and enjoy films and movies that these characters (Jennifer Lawrence, Sandra Bullock, Bradley Cooper, etc.). The issue, I believe, also leans toward the feminist issues side. I believe that this is an issue that men can certainly be interested in but the main audience I believe will be women (If I was writing a piece on how these women do NOT deserve more than they are currently getting I believe the gender of the audience may be different). I believe that the audience of this article would have a large range of academic and professional backgrounds. Both educated and uneducated people love movie stars and no specific profession would be less interested than any other. Middle class to wealthy people are probably more likely to read this as the lower classes would be more likely to associate the female actresses plea for more money (equal pay) with greed.

I believe the readers will value you facts and figures in addition to dialog. Because the controversy deals with money I think that figures demonstrating and showing the wage gap will be crucial.In addition to figures I think other visual aides will be important. Because the article is about Movie stars and the audience is likely to be comprised of fans who support the actresses or actors I believe that photos of the stars will be important.

2. Purpose

I think the main purpose of this literary work is to inform readers of both sides of the issue so they can make an educated decision on their position. It will be very important for me to stay unbiased and express only facts about the issue. I do not want to sway the reader in either direction but instead provide them with all of the information I can in order to enable them to decide on their own. In addition to providing facts about both sides I also want to integrate why this issue is significant in areas other than Hollywood as pay differences are at the heart of the controversy. As a part of staying unbiased I feel I need to keep from shedding a bad light on the characters(stakeholders). Some of the stakeholders have said some rash things making them seem insensitive to the issues at hand and I believe that I will need to find a way to present the quotes and goings-on but avoid the insensitive nature.

The controversy is current and still going on making it an ongoing issue that needs to presented as such.

3. Author

Well, obviously, I am the author of this QRG piece! I believe that I am fit to be the author of this piece because, not only is it something that I am interested in, but I have researched it thoroughly  and it applies to both of my majors: Arts and Business. I recognize with not necessarily feminism as that seems to carry a sort of stigma, but with equality. This controversy is about equality, not women over men or men earning too much, but instead women who work just as hard as men and are not compensated in the same way men are. I am very interested in this issue as I am interested in equality as a whole. Last semester my honors colloquium course was titled "Policing after Ferguson" and dealt with issues of equality in race, power, and social standing. The entire course was dedicated to speaking intelligently and openly about the issues of equality. In that class we heard every persons opinion making me sensitive to both sides of the argument. Because of this I believe I will be able to effectively display both sides of the story despite my favoring towards equality. 

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Considering Genre

ClkerFreeVectorImages. "Todo List". 04/29/2014 via pixabay.
CC0 Public Domain
In this blog post I will be covering which genre I will be using in order to complete my first project. I will cover the general conventions of the genre that I will need to take into consideration as well as what problems and worries I expect to have as I begin the creation phase of my project.

1. What Genre? Why?

For this first project I will be creating a Quick Reference Guide (QRG). Many of the articles I have read have been organized similarly to the QRG examples provided to us on d2l. I believe that a QRG will be the best format to present both sides of an argument and I will easily be able to highlight important quotes and phrases.

2. What genre conventions do you intend on developing over the next week? How will you use the conventions to suit the purpose of the assignment?

The first thing I plan on tackling is formatting. Without proper formatting a QRG is really just a short essay type article. I plan on figuring out how to format my QRG and then I will go about outlining the most important information so as to actually keep my QRG quick. 


3. How are you feeling as you begin production? What challenges do you anticipate?

I'm feeling fairly confident as we go into production week. I am excited to try out a new genre on a topic I genuinely care about but I am worried about major hick-ups as I have other school work in other classes this week too. I anticipate have a little trouble making all of my ideas "quick" and I also anticipate a bit of trouble with formatting. However I feel confident on my knowledge of my subject and I believe that only minor things (maybe a little more info on production companies) will need to be adjusted as I begin to actually create my QRG.

Cluster of Stakeholders

Teegardin, Ken. "Stack Of Cash". 07/08/2011 via flickr.
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.0 Generic
The stake holders in this situation can be overall quite broad: all Hollywood actors, actresses, and production companies. The main stakeholders, for the purpose of this assignment will be Jennifer Lawrence, Sandra Bullock, Maryl Streep, Patricia Arquette, Bradley Cooper, and Jeremy Renner. The men have very little to lose aside from maybe a million dollars or 2 per film so women co-stars can make equal what the men do. The women have a bit more to lose. As they fight for more money they may lose roles they would have previously obtained with ease. 

Evaluation of General Sources

Millan, Alvaro. "Mind the Gap". 04/03/2009 via flickr
Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
 I will be doing my first assignment loosely around the topic of business. On top of being a business major I am also an art major and I would consider myself to be a pretty serious feminist so this topic is dear to my heart as it spans all three. I will be doing my project on the wage gap between men an women in Hollywood and specializing in the commentary that Jennifer Lawrence has had on the issue since the 2015 Oscars.

Source 1: thegaurdian.com

URL: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/13/jennifer-lawrence-hollywood-gender-pay-gap

Author: Nigel M. Smith; "Nigel M Smith the Guardian's entertainment writer, based in Los Angeles. Formerly managing editor of Indiewire, he has also written about film and culture for USA Today, Bullet Magazine and MTV"

Last Updated: October 13th, 2015, all (hyper)links are still functional

Purpose: This particular article was written for the Guardian Newspaper and is meant to be an entertainment/informational piece as opposed to an Opp Ed or persuasive article. I am particularly interested in this article as the author is male writing on a feminist topic.

Graphics: The only Graphic is a photograph of Jennifer Lawrence at the Oscars. Pertinent simply because she is the main character of the article.

Position on Subject: The author does not seem to take a position but instead relays the story through strings of direct quotes and paraphrases from the actress herself. The text can easily be backed up by audio from interviews and other news stories that recorded the same quotes.

Links: The article supplies 4 hyperlinks. All 4 are in perfect working condition and link to sites that backup the info stated in the article. One link goes to an essay that Jennifer Lawrence has taken crdit for writing, another links to a list of salary and pay figures for actors and actresses, the third links to Lawrence's Forbes profile, and the 4th and final link goes to a different article regarding Lawrence's pay versus co-star Chris Pratt.

Source 2: Variety.com

URL: http://variety.com/2015/film/news/hollywood-gender-pay-gap-inequality-1201636553/

Author: Ramin Setoohed; no background info is stated on the Variety website

Last Updated: October 13th, 2015; all links are still in working condition

Purpose: This article was written for Variety U.S., a tabloid-esque magazine. The purpose is obviously first to entertain as tabloids often strive to do. The story is legitimate but seems embellished in comparison to other news sources I have read.

Graphics: The article contains 3 graphics that I can only imagine are pictures that were used for the print magazine itself. One graphic appears to be the cover of the magazine and the other two follow the same general color and content scheme. The photos indicate the idea of a woman sticking it to the man in the form of Voodoo Dolls.

Position on Subject: The article seems to be a bit biased on the side of the actresses making the entire story seem a bit more dramatic than necessary. However, despite a bit of embellishing the article is verified by a series of hyperlinks that lead to webpages and direct interviews from Lawrence herself.

Links: The article contains 5 hyperlinks. 3 of which link to actresses online profiles within the Variety website: Jennifer Lawrence, Sandra Bullock, and Kathy Griffin). One link goes to the profile of a male actor, and the fifth link, in total tabloid style, links to a page that is purely pictures of celebrity hair.

Reddit & What I Found There

Blue, Eva. "reddit sticker - 3". 12/22/2010 via flickr.
Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

I have, personally, never used Reddit so I was unsure of what to expect when looking at the website. This blog post includes details of two forums I read and explains the arguments and differences of opinion that are housed within each forum. 

Reddit Forum 1: Marketing and stuff


In this form a young business man who is new to the marketing world explains the month-long experiment he held in order to determine if Twitter is indeed a good source for business related followers to reach out. In his experiment he discovered no but many of the comments disagree. Some agree saying that following 3000 twitter users but only gaining 7 email subscribers is not worth any effort at all while others disagree saying that using a bot to do your following and unfollowing has no affect on you, the business man, and therefore is worth it to gain any number of business supporters.

Because I had never used or looked at Reddit before I did not really know what to expect. Because of that I had a lot of trouble finding forums that seemed as if they would contain a disagreement. In this forum the author disagrees with himself as he hypothesized that Twitter would work but doesn't. The main argument, however, lies in the comments, something I was not expecting.

Reddit Forum 2: Marketing and stuff


When scrolling through marketing forums that are all about advertising and how the job works I was surprised to see this forum. This forum is genuinely a woman asking for advice on whether to stick with her current marketing job or switch over to a new job of which she has been offered. 

Once again the debate was not in the forum post (although there is a pros-cons list) but instead is in the comments. The subject of changing jobs, especially in a case where young children, pay changes, and moving states is applicable, is often a very sticky one. The commentators did not take that into consideration when giving advice but instead said what they would do if it was them. The forum author responded to many of the comments but seemed to be frustrated as each comment left out an important aspect of taking this new job. 

Overall, reading each forum gave me a bit of hope. These people are so interested in their jobs, and others jobs, that they are willing to use their free time talking about and advising on it.